The PC Revolution

Another breath it's going to be long.

I just read on Wikipedia about the Islamic Revolution in Persia, Iran, 40 years ago. I found no mention of blowing up cinemas on their audiences. 400 killed in one blast. This is an example of a lie that is not of the type of 2 + 2 = 5. I remember the news on the radio, and anyone who describes the Khomeini revolution without cinema explosion is simply lying. Terrorism has been there from the beginning, it is not something that started with demonstrations and slipped into terrorism after the regime change. I did not read everything, so may be I missed it, but a cinemas blasting should be in a prominent place that I cannot miss. Terror was the essence of the Islamic Revolution. And why do I mention crackles from 40 years ago? Because back then I couldn’t understand how the Persian people choose a leader whose election propaganda was mass murdering of his own people. My lack of understanding did not prevent Khomeini from winning the election, not sure there was another real candidate, but even in a fair election Khomeini would have won. I am sure Khomeini didn’t invent the method, although no doubt brought some refinements.

About that time I saw a forgotten interview with some Abu, a leader of some front who was asked on his deathbed, how he justifies the random killing of innocent people. The answer was: "There is no need to explain terrorism, terrorism explains itself." It is worthwhile that everyone will internalize the words of that wise Arab. Not only in Persia, but also in Israel, terrorism works. The first case that I noticed, was the Maalot massacre. The result was many murdered Jews and a significant improvement in the Arab position. In the United States, too, Islam has taken a great leap as a result of the Twin Towers collapse. As that Abu puts it, terrorism explains itself. Terrorism works.

 After 40 years my understanding has improved. The Democratic Party in the United States, chooses election propaganda similar to that of Khomeini, and with considerable success. There is no fundamental difference between, blowing up cinemas on their audiences, and neutralizing the police and releasing criminal gangs that randomly rob and murder civilians. In both cases the goal is to strike fear in people hearts, undermine trust in the government, and in the final stage to oust the government. In Iran it worked well. In the United States it will not work fully, but even partial success in some areas is a severe blow to the free world. This is the place to admit a previous mistake in this Whatsup. I referred to the cancellation of the police as a joke, and anticipated a quick recovery, "a little blow to the wing." The reality version is a disaster. In cities and countries where the response to the riots is a reduction in the police, it is not a reduction that is a cancellation. A police officer in such region, who would make a mistake and intervenes in an incident, will immediately acknowledge his mistake and will not repeat it. In my understanding these cities are occupied territory, occupied by the PC revolution. This is not to say that looting and murder continue at the same level as in the early days. But looting and murder do continue at a level that will cause people who can to leave, and investors to flee. It does not seem likely to me that we will see this in the media. After seeing looting shows on TV accompanied by text and commentators, explaining it is a demonstration, I ignore the institutionalized media. Although the United States is not Iran, and the American people mostly worship freedom, it is difficult on a personal level to oppose a terrorist regime. I wish I was wrong but it is hard for me to see such an occupied area recovered from its condition.

I thought of the name "Cultural Revolution", according to the Chinese model. In China, historical symbols were destroyed and millions of people were killed in the name of hallucination over a rotten culture. At the signing of the Oslo Accords, I anticipated a war, and gave it the name “Oslo War”. We did get a war, over a thousand killed; the name however did not catch on so much. It seems to me that “PC revolution” is a more accurate name. We'll see what will catch on. I guess in the institutionalized media, all the networks with the “C” in their name, CNN, ABC, BBC etc. are talking about demonstrations and not revolution. In the long range, it will be impossible to pump up the version of the demonstrations and it will be necessary to name the revolution.

 

I estimate there have been dozens of killings in Seattle, and there will be more at the takeover stage if that has not already happened. Why do I think so? We have people with violent leftist ideology, police cancellation and occasional criminals. Weapons are already there. That seems to be enough. The media, which reports riots as demonstrations, is not expected to report deaths in Seattle. Those who live in Seattle do not need reporters and will leave as soon as they manage to sell their home. It is not that after the administration takes over the autonomy of the rioters, the situation will return to normal. Violence and fear will soon dominate Seattle. Of course all this prophecy will evaporate if Seattle will chooses a governor who will back up the police, law and order. It just does not seem to me that this is the direction in Seattle and the other occupied cities. The media will not allow such a governor to conduct any election campaign.

New Yorker, What's going on in New York? I realized that the PC revolution had conquered New York as well. Hard to grasp that, New York is the capital of the free world. Police canceled / reduced / lost backup? Still feeling safe or no longer? Obviously the answer is divided into areas. I hope you are in a relatively safe area.

Usually either a revolution succeeds or fails. What is special about this revolution is that it has succeeded in several areas. And the central government does not directly intervene in the occupied cities. Why should citizens choose governors who abandon them for fear of violence and murder? Well it has worked in Iran and other places in the world.

Is it possible to elect now in Seattle a Mayor candidate whose election platform is something like:

• Full immunity for any police officer who kills a criminal and even if accidentally kills an innocent citizen. (Less than that will not rehabilitate the police)

• Throwing all those involved in the riots in prison for 30 years.

• Restoration of public monuments, etc.

Somehow it does not seem to me that the TV networks will allow such a candidate to run. Seattle is going to sink, whoever can, will leave, new entrepreneurs will not come. I wish I had to admit a mistake.

At this difficult time, the hope of the free world is US President Donald Trump, who is also the leader of the free world. In fact President Trump is the reason for the PC revolution. Donald Trump was elected president because he cracked the Politically Correct, in every second sentence he said in his election campaign. Donald Trump understood that the trouble of the United States stems from Politically Correct. The problems must not be talked about and therefore there is no chance of solving them. Politically Correct is at every level and to an Israeli ear like mine, it is not always clear the difference between Politically Correct and excessive American politeness. But even in Israel at the Technion, where it is forbidden to demonstrate on any subject, you sit at the dining table or over a cup of coffee and you may encounter left-wing talking. These are the opinions from radio and television so leftists do not feel they are saying something that might be someone who opposes it. A right-winger who sits at the same table will usually give up and not speak because he does not feel like arguing. If the righty does decide to express his view, he will immediately feel his chair warming up. And it continues at the state level. It is forbidden to say terrorism and Islam in the same sentence, so it is impossible to fight Islam. Bush has declared war on terror. Abu Hamza said it was impossible to fight an abstract noun. Ownership of property, land, belonging to a family, a people, are all things that are not nice to talk about. The PC fabricated charges against normal ordinary citizen. The most comfortable person to control is a person who is convinced that he is guilty of something.

Trump's election victory completely drove PC leaders crazy, whose biggest body is the Democratic Party. It started with "Not My President." Continued in all sorts of trials and commissions of inquiry in which Democrats accused President Trump of crimes they themselves committed. Look at the value of Clinton's thefts (I lost the emails, yes but it seems someone still kept them and drips as needed), which became a Russian intervention in the election as well as Biden's theft in Ukraine, the idiot even bragged about it in a TV interview turned into a media investigation against President Trump. In between incitement and defamation at levels not seen before. Democrats/Media tried to explain to us that Trump is stupid, rude, raped, primitive and what not. Well there is no doubt that President Trump loves women and especially beauties. But this is not something special. Most people want a beautiful wife,  long life and a lot of money. Not many succeed and they are not necessarily stupid. A woman, who was once very beautiful, filed a lawsuit against Trump for rape or something similar. The judge ruled that she must pay President Trump a hefty compensation. So instead of hearing what President Trump is saying, I decided to hear President Trump. I did not hear him swear. President Trump, speaks directly but does not slip into rudeness. What the priests of the PC call rude and primitive is simply disobedience to the laws of the PC.

 

I saw President Trump's election conference before the Corona, the man spoke fluently throws jokes, does not get excited and gives a great show. On July 4, I saw President Trump's speech on Mount Rushmore, with the huge statues of presidents in the background. There is a gap there that allows President Trump to be included as well, if he succeeds in the PC revolution in a good way. Inspirational speech, I encourage everyone to listen to every word. It is quite clear that President Trump understands what he is facing and that he is determined to win.

President Trump's victory in the upcoming election was certain, and it drove the PC priests from the Democratic Party completely crazy. This is why the PC revolution broke out. That is why President Trump is both the trigger for the PC revolution and the hope for its defeat.

There is more but it spills too much for me anyway. Good days.

 

Yiftach Maayan

yiftach.blog@gmail.com